Summary and Critical Response Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Summary and Critical repartee - Assignment ExampleSome skills are learnt in these workplaces, Etzioni claims, but they are often non a steady-going example. Money earned in these jobs is spent by teens to support themselves, in poorer areas, or deliver for a major item, but more often it is used to buy trend items, with little pertinacious value, according to Etzioni. He concludes the article by advising balance in activities for teenagers, so that the desire to earn coin does not prevent a well-rounded educational process. (199 words) Critical Response to the article Working at McDonalds by Amitai Etzioni Amitai Etzioni in the article Working at McDonalds examines the phenomenon of teen employment in the United States. The authors central claim is that the kind of employment that is offered to teens, and their simplespread joining of such(prenominal) employment, is becoming a problem due to the inappropriate nature of the jobs they are able to get. At the outset, the author acknowledges that very few scientific studies have been carried out to examine the nature of jobs at places such as fast-food outlets. This concession may strengthen the consideration presented, because it suggests that the writer is going to persuade the reader with logical argument based on personal observations. A point of view is going to be proposed, for the audience to be convinced by. On the other hand, it may weaken the argument, in that not enough scientific solelyy turn out fact exists to strengthen what is being claimed. The latter is true. This article presents an almost entirely personal point-of-view, and inductions so wide that the reader would have to question even the most simple of Etzionis claims. An important example of stimulus generalization is that there are more traditional teen jobs, which are much better for young pack than current ones. The claim is that the traditional lemonade stands, which teach the value of entrepreneurship, and paper routes, to learn the skills of hard work and regular, good service fit into the American work ethic better than jobs currently(according to the writer). Not only is it a generalization to propose that every youngster in the past benefited from these wholesome jobs, it is also an appeal to the emotions of Americans, generally, in that the writer presumes that everyone believes that the old way of life in the USA was better than the current one. Other generalizations follow that all teenagers with very few exceptions spend their money unwisely that most fast-food outlets are poorly managed and do not allow for the employee to take initiative that all teenagers school education is badly affected by odd-job(prenominal) work. Added to these sweeping statements, the writer also appeals to the readers emotions, and exaggerates the actual conditions of work for teens. He uses negative toll such as pot party to describe these workplaces. Any parent would not be quick-witted with the possibility that a childs place of work could be described in this way. Etzioni but proposes that the kind of work available to teenagers causes the continued poverty of sections of the American population